View unanswered posts | View active topics
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 5 posts ] |
|
Author |
Message |
tibaldo
|
Posted: Thu May 24, 2007 6:27 am |
|
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 1:10 am Posts: 5 Location: Padova
|
Which quantity is described in the input file rbands_co4.fits? Is it the number density of hydrogen MOLECULES or the number density of PROTONS in form of molecules?
|
|
Top |
|
|
strong
|
Posted: Fri May 25, 2007 12:14 am |
|
Joined: Wed May 17, 2006 7:02 am Posts: 285 Location: MPE Garching
|
it's the integrated Tco dv, in units of K km s-1
which has to be converted to molecular hydrogen
column density using the famous Xco factor (e.g. as given in the galdef file).
_________________ Andy Strong, MPE
|
|
Top |
|
|
tibaldo
|
Posted: Fri May 25, 2007 12:36 am |
|
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 1:10 am Posts: 5 Location: Padova
|
I found some misleading information, both in the file header, where you wrote as unit cm^-2, and in the GALPROP v.50 manual (September 6, 2006), where (page 4 bottom) you can read "the H2 gas number density is defined in the form of table ... and the conversion factor is taken as X= ..."
|
|
Top |
|
|
strong
|
Posted: Fri May 25, 2007 12:58 am |
|
Joined: Wed May 17, 2006 7:02 am Posts: 285 Location: MPE Garching
|
there are two things:
1 the galprop internally modelled H_2 which is indeed as described in the manual on page 4, using a fixed Xco=1.9E20. This is used for cosmic-ray propagation but not for gamma-rays
2 the Wco rings in rbands, which are used to compute the gamma-rays.
You are apparently right about the error in the header, I informed Seth Digel !
Clearly 1 & 2 are not consistent: we know this and are working on a new version where they will be consistent. However the effect is not great.
But consistency is very desirable of course.
_________________ Andy Strong, MPE
|
|
Top |
|
|
digel
|
Posted: Sat May 26, 2007 10:30 pm |
|
Joined: Wed May 17, 2006 11:30 pm Posts: 2 Location: SLAC
|
Luigi is correct that the units are incorrectly stated in the header of rbands_co4.fits. They are K km s^-1, as Andy says. It was just a mistake to list the units as '10E20 cm-2'. This came about because I used the same BUNIT string for the H I rings (rbands_hi7.fits).
10E20 cm-2 now looks ambiguous (or wrong) to me for the H I rings. I meant 10^20 cm^-2. I'll fix the headers of both files in their next update.
Thanks, Luigi, for pointing out the error.
_________________ Seth Digel
|
|
Top |
|
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 5 posts ] |
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 1 guest |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|