View unanswered posts | View active topics
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 3 posts ] |
|
Author |
Message |
hsyang
|
Posted: Tue Sep 04, 2012 11:59 am |
|
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2012 10:34 am Posts: 2
|
Hi,
I have a quick question about the ISRF data files for version 54. There're lots of data files under the ISRF/Standard directory, but I was not able to find a documentation of how the files are named (or could you please point me to one?). For example, what does Standard_8.5_0_30_[Flux,Scattered,Termal_HP,Total_HP,Transient_HP].dat mean? If I'd like to look for a file similar to MilkyWay_DR0.5_DZ0.1_DPHI10_RMAX20_ZMAX5_galprop_format.fits in v50, but with updated data and extended zmax to 20kpc, which file should I use?
Thanks a lot for your help!
|
|
Top |
|
|
tporter
|
Posted: Tue Sep 04, 2012 10:06 pm |
|
Joined: Wed May 17, 2006 2:35 pm Posts: 23 Location: Santa Cruz, California
|
The file `Standard.dat' provides a basic (ASCII) directory structure that is read by GALPROP. Each part of this, e.g., Standard_X_Y_Z_(name)_HP.fits.gz gives certain components of the ISRF at the (X,Y,Z) location (in kpc). The important files for IC losses are the Standard_X_Y_Z_Total_HP.fits.gz and Standard_X_Y_Z_Flux.fits.gz -- these give the intensity and integrated flux as a function of frequency at the location X,Y,Z, respectively. GALPROP simply reads in the sampled ISRF and bi-linearly interpolates (for 2D) to give the ISRF for a location that is not at one of the sampled grid points. There is no `simple' file like the earlier versions because of the additional angular information, and break down into different components (I can provide a description of what the different components are for, but this is only of interest if you want to use them for studies unrelated to calculating total IC emission/energy losses).
_________________ Dr. Troy A. Porter Hansen Experimental Physics Laboratory 452 Lomita Mall Stanford University Stanford, CA 94305
|
|
Top |
|
|
hsyang
|
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 12:37 pm |
|
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2012 10:34 am Posts: 2
|
Hi Troy,
Thanks a lot for your reply. I have a related question: What is the main differences between the ISRF in v54 and v50? For my application I'd like to compute a simulated gamma-ray map using the ISRF data up to z=6kpc. Do you expect the results to be significantly different if I use extrapolated values from the ISRF v50 or the ISRF v54 which extends to zmax=20kpc?
Thanks in advance!
|
|
Top |
|
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 3 posts ] |
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|